PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Spain Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPEH.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEH.L achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.L's 15.91% return.


SPEH.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.68%
6M
0.34%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*

CNDX.L

1D
-0.67%
1M
-3.48%
6M
16.01%
YTD
15.91%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
20.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPEH.L
iShares Spain Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.87%3.59%4.70%9.02%-16.01%-2.52%5.30%11.64%1.72%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
15.91%19.75%26.42%56.22%-33.49%27.92%48.25%37.96%-6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEH.L and CNDX.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018

0.07

Over the past year, SPEH.L and CNDX.L have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEH.L
SPEH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SPEH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Spain Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPEH.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEH.LCNDX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.57

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

8.61

-5.48

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEH.L and CNDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEH.L drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, smaller than the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEH.L and CNDX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEH.LCNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-35.21%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-11.00%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.54%

-22.44%

+18.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.21%

-35.21%

+17.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-3.87%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-5.12%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

3.29%

-2.22%

Volatility

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Spain Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPEH.L) is 1.16%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that SPEH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEH.LCNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

5.89%

-4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.60%

13.78%

-10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

17.32%

-13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

21.15%

-14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.82%

20.13%

-14.31%

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEH.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPEH.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPEH.L nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEH.L and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPEH.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPEH.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CNDX.L.

SPEH.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. SPEH.L tracks iShares Spain Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc), while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SPEH.L and 0.33% for CNDX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEH.L and CNDX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer