SPEDX vs. RLSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund (SPEDX) and RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX).
SPEDX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 1, 2009. RLSIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2012.
Performance
SPEDX vs. RLSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPEDX vs. RLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEDX Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund | -7.22% | 6.22% | 23.03% | 4.24% | -13.90% | 3.96% | 47.30% | 12.79% | -2.32% | 9.46% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | -12.16% | 8.57% | 16.06% | 43.85% | -53.89% | 2.10% | 54.74% | 20.00% | -2.20% | 22.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEDX achieves a -7.22% return, which is significantly higher than RLSIX's -12.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SPEDX has outperformed RLSIX with an annualized return of 7.51%, while RLSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.37% annualized return.
SPEDX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -7.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
RLSIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- -12.16%
- 6M
- -12.05%
- 1Y
- 1.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- -5.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPEDX vs. RLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEDX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than RLSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SPEDX vs. RLSIX — Risk / Return Rank
SPEDX
RLSIX
SPEDX vs. RLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund (SPEDX) and RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEDX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.09 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 0.24 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.03 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.05 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | -0.17 | +1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEDX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.09 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.21 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.25 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.34 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEDX and RLSIX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SPEDX vs. RLSIX - Dividend Comparison
SPEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while RLSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEDX Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.69% | 4.94% | 3.75% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.32% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 11.66% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPEDX vs. RLSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEDX drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, smaller than the maximum RLSIX drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEDX and RLSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEDX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.02% | -60.82% | +31.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -14.56% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -60.82% | +31.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.02% | -60.82% | +31.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.18% | -34.87% | +25.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -14.92% | +7.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 4.36% | -1.37% |
Volatility
SPEDX vs. RLSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund (SPEDX) is 2.69%, while RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that SPEDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPEDX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 3.92% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 8.89% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 16.58% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.02% | 25.20% | -13.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 21.52% | -8.74% |