SPED.L vs. XLKS.L
SPED.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPED.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while XLKS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPED.L returned 8.23%/yr vs 25.25%/yr for XLKS.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPED.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPED.L achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 23.53% return.
SPED.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- YTD
- 23.53%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 52.93%
- 3Y*
- 36.69%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 26.28%
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPED.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.35% | 11.67% | 12.37% | 13.50% | -12.03% | 11.48% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 23.53% | 24.23% | 41.72% | 60.64% | -29.12% | 22.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPED.L and XLKS.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021 | 0.49 |
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPED.L
XLKS.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SPED.L
XLKS.L
Industrials
SPED.L
XLKS.L
Financial Services
SPED.L
XLKS.L
Healthcare
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Real Estate
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Utilities
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Energy
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Basic Materials
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Communication Services
SPED.L
XLKS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPED.L
XLKS.L
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPED.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.10 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.31 | 9.28 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPED.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.61 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.06 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.04 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPED.L drawdown since its inception was -20.80%, smaller than the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPED.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPED.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.80% | -34.26% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.75% | -16.99% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -26.97% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.80% | -34.26% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.15% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -5.09% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 5.69% | -3.77% |
Volatility
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) is 2.60%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that SPED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPED.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 7.45% | -4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | 15.54% | -8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 20.19% | -9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 23.80% | -6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 22.04% | -4.52% |
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPED.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPED.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
SPED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while XLKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPED.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.28% | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.51% | 0.74% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPED.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPED.L.
SPED.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XLKS.L is Technology Equities. SPED.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPED.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for SPED.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer