PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPED.L vs. SPYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPED.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
0.30%11.67%12.37%17.24%
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-4.07%17.39%25.33%14.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPED.L achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.L's -4.07% return.


SPED.L

1D
1.74%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
0.30%
6M
2.32%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYL.L

1D
2.47%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-4.07%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPED.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPED.L
SPED.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SPED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.L
SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPED.LSPYL.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.14

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.65

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

4.12

-2.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.72

18.27

-12.54

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPED.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPED.L and SPYL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPED.LSPYL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.14

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.54

-1.04

Correlation

The correlation between SPED.L and SPYL.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison

SPED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while SPYL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
SPED.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
1.39%1.36%1.39%1.46%1.51%0.74%
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPED.L drawdown since its inception was -20.80%, which is greater than SPYL.L's maximum drawdown of -18.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPED.L and SPYL.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPED.LSPYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.80%

-18.42%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.66%

-11.78%

-0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-5.41%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-1.83%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.83%

+0.32%

Volatility

SPED.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) is 4.04%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that SPED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPED.LSPYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

4.84%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

8.65%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

15.92%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

14.03%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

14.03%

+3.73%