PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPED.L vs. SPXS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPED.L achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS.L's 8.95% return.


SPED.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.22%
6M
8.40%
YTD
11.81%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*

SPXS.L

1D
-1.32%
1M
-0.60%
6M
8.00%
YTD
8.95%
1Y
-98.80%
3Y*
-74.24%
5Y*
-55.04%
10Y*
-27.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPED.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
11.81%11.67%12.23%14.00%-11.82%13.24%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.95%-98.82%25.56%27.00%-18.53%20.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SPED.L and SPXS.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.85

The correlation between SPED.L and SPXS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPED.L
SPED.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPED.LSPXS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.51

+0.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

-1.00

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

-1.22

+10.92

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPED.L and SPXS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPED.L drawdown since its inception was -20.85%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPED.L and SPXS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPED.LSPXS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-99.07%

+78.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-99.07%

+92.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-99.07%

+80.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.85%

-99.07%

+78.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-98.91%

+98.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-7.69%

+2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

80.82%

-78.91%

Volatility

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) is 2.76%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXS.L) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that SPED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPED.LSPXS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

3.01%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

9.33%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

99.43%

-88.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

47.12%

-31.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

35.28%

-18.46%

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPED.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPED.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison

SPED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while SPXS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SPED.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
1.28%1.36%1.39%1.46%1.52%0.75%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPED.L and SPXS.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPED.L.

SPED.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while SPXS.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPED.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPED.L and SPXS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer