PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPED.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPED.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPED.L achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 22.95% return.


SPED.L

1D
0.37%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.35%
6M
10.62%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
-2.03%
1M
13.27%
YTD
22.95%
6M
22.91%
1Y
51.92%
3Y*
34.31%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
26.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPED.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
9.35%11.67%12.37%13.50%-12.03%11.48%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
22.95%23.07%38.50%58.65%-29.11%22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SPED.L and IITU.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021

0.46

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPED.L
IITU.L

Technology

18.3%
99.6%

Industrials

14.7%
0.0%

Financial Services

14.4%

-

Healthcare

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Utilities

6.1%

-

Energy

4.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Communication Services

4.0%

-

Technology

SPED.L
18.3%
IITU.L
99.6%

Industrials

SPED.L
14.7%
IITU.L
0.0%

Financial Services

SPED.L
14.4%
IITU.L

-

Healthcare

SPED.L
10.9%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPED.L
10.3%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SPED.L
6.5%
IITU.L

-

Real Estate

SPED.L
6.2%
IITU.L

-

Utilities

SPED.L
6.1%
IITU.L

-

Energy

SPED.L
4.6%
IITU.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPED.L
4.1%
IITU.L

-

Communication Services

SPED.L
4.0%
IITU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPED.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPED.L
SPED.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPED.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.07

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

9.27

+1.04

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPED.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPED.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.58

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.04

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.14

-0.52

Drawdowns

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPED.L drawdown since its inception was -20.80%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPED.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPED.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.80%

-34.22%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-16.80%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-26.42%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.80%

-34.22%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.20%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-5.93%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

5.59%

-3.67%

Volatility

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) is 2.60%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that SPED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPED.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

7.00%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.38%

15.11%

-7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

20.05%

-9.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

23.19%

-5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

21.85%

-4.33%

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPED.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPED.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

SPED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPED.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
1.28%1.36%1.39%1.46%1.51%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPED.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPED.L.

SPED.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SPED.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPED.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPED.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer