SPED.L vs. FWRA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPED.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - SPED.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while FWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPED.L returned 19.82% vs 28.82% for FWRA.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPED.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.

Performance

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPED.L achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 11.59% return.

SPED.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 15.22%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: —

FWRA.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPED.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist	9.35%	11.67%	12.37%	7.78%
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	11.59%	22.37%	18.07%	9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SPED.L and FWRA.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.75

The correlation between SPED.L and FWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPED.L	FWRA.L
Technology	18.3%	29.1%
Industrials	14.7%	11.0%
Financial Services	14.4%	16.4%
Healthcare	10.9%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	5.0%
Real Estate	6.2%	1.9%
Utilities	6.1%	2.6%
Energy	4.6%	4.3%
Basic Materials	4.1%	3.9%
Communication Services	4.0%	8.9%

Return for Risk

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPED.L

SPED.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
SPED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SPED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SPED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SPED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FWRA.L

FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPED.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.32	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.44	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.43	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.27	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.31	13.70	-3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPED.L and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPED.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.32	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	1.56	-0.94

Drawdowns

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPED.L drawdown since its inception was -20.80%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPED.L and FWRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPED.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.80%	-16.60%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.75%	-8.74%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.77%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-1.93%	-3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	2.09%	-0.17%

Volatility

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) is 2.60%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that SPED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPED.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	3.80%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.38%	9.86%	-2.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.68%	12.32%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	13.52%	+4.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.52%	13.52%	+4.00%

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPED.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPED.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

SPED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPED.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist	1.28%	1.36%	1.39%	1.46%	1.51%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPED.L and FWRA.L in my portfolio?

SPED.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPED.L or FWRA.L?

On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPED.L or FWRA.L?

FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPED.L.

What is the main difference between SPED.L and FWRA.L?

SPED.L is categorized as S&P 500, while FWRA.L is Global Equities. SPED.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPED.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.