SPED.L vs. BYBG.L
SPED.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) and BYBG.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) are both S&P 500 funds - SPED.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return while BYBG.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPED.L returned 8.23%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for BYBG.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPED.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BYBG.L.
Performance
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPED.L is traded in USD, while BYBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BYBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPED.L achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than BYBG.L's 8.19% return.
SPED.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
BYBG.L
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPED.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.35% | 11.67% | 12.37% | 13.50% | -12.03% | 11.48% |
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.19% | 17.67% | 13.90% | 15.36% | -11.84% | 11.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPED.L and BYBG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SPED.L and BYBG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Industrials
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Financial Services
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Healthcare
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Defensive
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Real Estate
SPED.L
BYBG.L
-
Utilities
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Energy
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Basic Materials
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Communication Services
SPED.L
BYBG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPED.L
BYBG.L
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPED.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 4.26 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.31 | 11.95 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPED.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.94 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPED.L drawdown since its inception was -20.80%, smaller than the maximum BYBG.L drawdown of -42.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPED.L and BYBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPED.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.80% | -42.67% | +21.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.75% | -5.29% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -19.07% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.80% | -23.28% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -5.69% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.89% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPED.L) is 2.60%, while Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that SPED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPED.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.35% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | 7.95% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 11.62% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.59% | 16.55% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 19.02% | -1.50% |
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPED.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BYBG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPED.L vs. BYBG.L - Dividend Comparison
SPED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while BYBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPED.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.28% | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.51% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPED.L and BYBG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BYBG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BYBG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPED.L.
SPED.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPED.L and 0.15% for BYBG.L.
Find the right allocation for SPED.L and BYBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer