SPDN vs. ZIVB
SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SPDN is passively managed, while ZIVB is actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPDN charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.
Performance
SPDN vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- -14.93%
- 3Y*
- -11.95%
- 5Y*
- -8.36%
- 10Y*
- -12.66%
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 1.38% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDN and ZIVB is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDN vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank
SPDN
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPDN vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPDN | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPDN vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDN drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDN and ZIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDN | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | 0.00% | -75.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.71% | 0.00% | -74.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.66% | 0.00% | -48.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.44% | — | — |
Volatility
SPDN vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDN | ZIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 112.57% | -99.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 112.57% | -95.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 112.57% | -94.53% |
SPDN vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDN vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison
SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than ZIVB's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 4.02% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDN and ZIVB have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.37% for ZIVB.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPDN and 1.35% for ZIVB.
Find the right allocation for SPDN and ZIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer