SPDN vs. TSDD
SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SPDN is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. Over the past year, SPDN returned -16.94% vs -62.89% for TSDD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPDN charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
SPDN vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDN achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's -4.27% return.
SPDN
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 6M
- -7.36%
- 1Y
- -16.94%
- 3Y*
- -12.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -7.81% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -6.28% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDN and TSDD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SPDN and TSDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDN vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
SPDN
TSDD
SPDN vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDN | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | -0.68 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | -0.87 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.83 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | -1.05 | -0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDN | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.41 | -0.68 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | -0.66 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SPDN vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDN drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDN and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDN | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -99.03% | +23.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.95% | -76.12% | +58.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.17% | -98.90% | +23.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.54% | -71.21% | +22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 59.88% | -50.10% |
Volatility
SPDN vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) is 2.78%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 24.19%. This indicates that SPDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDN | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 24.19% | -21.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 54.90% | -45.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 92.57% | -80.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 114.46% | -97.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 114.46% | -96.42% |
SPDN vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDN vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than TSDD's 8.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 4.09% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDN and TSDD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to SPDN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDN dropped -75.31% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, SPDN leads with -16.94% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -16.94% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 4.09% for SPDN.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPDN and 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDN and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer