SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L
SPDM.L (iShares Physical Palladium ETC) and CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - SPDM.L tracks the London Palladium PM Fix while CMFP.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDM.L returned 10.16%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for CMFP.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPDM.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CMFP.L.
Performance
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDM.L achieves a -13.23% return, which is significantly lower than CMFP.L's 20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDM.L has outperformed CMFP.L with an annualized return of 10.16%, while CMFP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.
SPDM.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- -13.23%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- 1Y
- 36.78%
- 3Y*
- -3.85%
- 5Y*
- -12.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
CMFP.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 20.51%
- 6M
- 19.70%
- 1Y
- 32.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDM.L iShares Physical Palladium ETC | -13.23% | 62.20% | -17.63% | -41.15% | 5.58% | -19.60% | 19.23% | 47.36% | 25.02% | 42.70% |
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 20.51% | 8.49% | 6.86% | -11.43% | 32.79% | 34.61% | -0.92% | 3.99% | -3.16% | -6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDM.L and CMFP.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPDM.L
CMFP.L
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDM.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 4.96 | -3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 12.17 | -9.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDM.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.24 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.91 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.68 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.27 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDM.L drawdown since its inception was -70.87%, which is greater than CMFP.L's maximum drawdown of -50.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDM.L and CMFP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDM.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.87% | -50.47% | -20.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.67% | -6.63% | -29.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.59% | -12.97% | -27.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.87% | -23.51% | -47.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.87% | -23.95% | -46.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.18% | -2.55% | -53.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -24.51% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.54% | 2.70% | +13.84% |
Volatility
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) at 4.92%. This indicates that SPDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMFP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDM.L | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 4.92% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.16% | 12.12% | +25.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.70% | 14.68% | +30.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.85% | 14.85% | +27.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.57% | 13.92% | +23.65% |
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDM.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CMFP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDM.L vs. CMFP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPDM.L nor CMFP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDM.L and CMFP.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPDM.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPDM.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CMFP.L.
SPDM.L tracks London Palladium PM Fix, while CMFP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPDM.L and 0.30% for CMFP.L.
Find the right allocation for SPDM.L and CMFP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer