SPBX vs. OCTW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SPBX (AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF) and OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Allianz. SPBX is actively managed, while OCTW is passively managed. Over the past year, SPBX returned 12.98% vs 10.67% for OCTW. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPBX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for OCTW.

Performance

SPBX vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBX achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than OCTW's 5.56% return.

SPBX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.64%
• 6M: 5.97%
• YTD: 6.84%
• 1Y: 12.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OCTW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: 4.84%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 1Y: 10.67%
• 3Y*: 10.60%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBX vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBX AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF	6.84%	9.79%
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	5.56%	9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBX and OCTW is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025	0.94

The correlation between SPBX and OCTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPBX vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBX

SPBX Risk / Return Rank: 86
SPBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SPBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SPBX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
SPBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SPBX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 84
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 88
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBX vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPBX	OCTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.15	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	3.17	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.44	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	2.88	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.91	14.64	-0.73

SPBX vs. OCTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the OCTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBX and OCTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPBX vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBX drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, which is greater than OCTW's maximum drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBX and OCTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBX	OCTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.11%	-8.38%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.49%	-3.65%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-0.81%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.72%	+0.21%

Volatility

SPBX vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF (SPBX) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) at 1.32%. This indicates that SPBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBX	OCTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.63%	1.32%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.70%	3.91%	+0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.53%	4.91%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.20%	6.32%	+2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.20%	6.12%	+3.08%

SPBX vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTW's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBX vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPBX nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBX and OCTW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SPBX and OCTW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPBX or OCTW?

SPBX has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to OCTW (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBX dropped -11.11% vs OCTW's -8.38%.

Which ETF is better, SPBX or OCTW?

On 1-year performance, SPBX leads with 12.98% vs 10.67% for OCTW. On fees, OCTW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBX or OCTW?

Over the 1-year period, SPBX has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBX or OCTW?

OCTW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBX or OCTW?

SPBX and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SPBX and OCTW?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBX and 0.74% for OCTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.