SPBC vs. SPMO
SPBC (Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPBC is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. SPBC is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPBC returned 15.96%/yr vs 24.29%/yr for SPMO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPBC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SPBC vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPBC achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
SPBC
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
SPBC vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPBC Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF | 7.71% | 16.83% | 37.32% | 48.04% | -28.00% | 14.87% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPBC and SPMO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SPBC and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPBC vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPBC
SPMO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPBC
SPMO
Financial Services
SPBC
SPMO
Communication Services
SPBC
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
SPBC
SPMO
Healthcare
SPBC
SPMO
Industrials
SPBC
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
SPBC
SPMO
Energy
SPBC
SPMO
Utilities
SPBC
SPMO
Real Estate
SPBC
SPMO
Basic Materials
SPBC
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPBC vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SPBC
SPMO
SPBC vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPBC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.64 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 14.17 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPBC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.62 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 1.27 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.01 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
SPBC vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPBC drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBC and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPBC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -30.95% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -12.70% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.00% | -20.13% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | -22.74% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | 0.00% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -4.60% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.26% | +0.11% |
Volatility
SPBC vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) is 3.38%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that SPBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPBC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 7.35% | -3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 14.39% | -3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 17.64% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 19.30% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 20.31% | +0.08% |
SPBC vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPBC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPBC vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SPBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPBC Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.98% | 3.79% | 0.60% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPBC and SPMO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to SPBC (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBC dropped -33.99% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 15.96% for SPBC. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPBC has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 15.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPBC.
SPBC has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
SPBC is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPBC and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPBC and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer