SPBC vs. MFUL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPBC (Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPBC returned 28.29%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for MFUL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPBC charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.

Performance

SPBC vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBC achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.28% return.

SPBC

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: 21.45%
• 3Y*: 28.29%
• 5Y*: 15.96%
• 10Y*: —

MFUL

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 3.33%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBC vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPBC Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF	7.71%	16.83%	37.32%	48.04%	-28.00%	-2.15%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.28%	4.51%	5.36%	2.24%	-12.46%	-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBC and MFUL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.62

Over the past year, SPBC and MFUL have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SPBC vs. MFUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPBC	MFUL
Technology	35.6%	25.8%
Financial Services	11.8%	10.7%
Communication Services	11.2%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	8.7%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.7%
Energy	3.5%	8.0%
Utilities	2.4%	5.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.8%	5.5%

Return for Risk

SPBC vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBC

SPBC Risk / Return Rank: 40
SPBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SPBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SPBC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SPBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SPBC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 52
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBC vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPBC	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.82	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.59	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	2.13	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	8.24	-1.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPBC vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBC and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPBC	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.82	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.01	+0.79

Drawdowns

SPBC vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBC drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBC and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBC	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.99%	-16.41%	-17.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.24%	-3.36%	-8.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.00%	-4.74%	-16.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-0.46%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.64%	-9.50%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	0.87%	+2.50%

Volatility

SPBC vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.46%. This indicates that SPBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBC	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	1.46%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	3.23%	+7.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	3.93%	+10.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	4.24%	+16.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.39%	4.24%	+16.15%

SPBC vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBC vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

SPBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than MFUL's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.01%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%	0.00%
SPBC Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF	0.83%	0.85%	0.98%	3.79%	0.60%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBC and MFUL in my portfolio?

SPBC and MFUL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPBC or MFUL?

SPBC has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to MFUL (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBC dropped -33.99% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, SPBC or MFUL?

On 3-year performance, SPBC leads with 28.29% vs 4.96% for MFUL. On fees, SPBC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBC or MFUL?

Over the 3-year period, SPBC has performed better with a 28.29% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBC or MFUL?

SPBC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBC or MFUL?

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.83% for SPBC.

What is the main difference between SPBC and MFUL?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPBC and 1.10% for MFUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.