PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPAX vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPAX vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF (SPAX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPAX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAX vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPAX
Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF
0.00%0.02%5.11%6.63%1.25%2.19%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAX and SPUS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.04

SPAX vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPAX
SPUS

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.0%

Communication Services

-

6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

3.3%

Healthcare

-

11.1%

Industrials

-

7.0%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Technology

-

57.3%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Financial Services

SPAX
100.0%
SPUS

-

Basic Materials

SPAX

-

SPUS
3.0%

Communication Services

SPAX

-

SPUS
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPAX

-

SPUS
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPAX

-

SPUS
2.9%

Energy

SPAX

-

SPUS
3.3%

Healthcare

SPAX

-

SPUS
11.1%

Industrials

SPAX

-

SPUS
7.0%

Real Estate

SPAX

-

SPUS
1.4%

Technology

SPAX

-

SPUS
57.3%

Utilities

SPAX

-

SPUS
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPAX vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAX

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAX vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF (SPAX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPAX vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPAXSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

Drawdowns

SPAX vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPAXSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

Volatility

SPAX vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPAXSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

SPAX vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPAX vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

SPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SPAX
Robinson Alternative Yield Pre-merger SPAC ETF
0.00%0.00%5.50%7.54%0.97%0.00%0.00%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPAX and SPUS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAX.

SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for SPAX.

SPAX is categorized as Event Driven, while SPUS is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SPAX and 0.45% for SPUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPAX and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer