SPAQ vs. QGRD
SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) and QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPAQ is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while QGRD is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
SPAQ vs. QGRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPAQ achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than QGRD's 15.09% return.
SPAQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRD
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 8.60%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ vs. QGRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 2.81% | 1.31% |
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 15.09% | 8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPAQ and QGRD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPAQ vs. QGRD — Risk / Return Rank
SPAQ
QGRD
SPAQ vs. QGRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPAQ | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPAQ | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 2.16 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
SPAQ vs. QGRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPAQ drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum QGRD drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAQ and QGRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPAQ | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -9.41% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.13% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -2.19% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | — | — |
Volatility
SPAQ vs. QGRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPAQ | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 12.92% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 12.92% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 12.92% | -5.92% |
SPAQ vs. QGRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPAQ and QGRD have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
SPAQ vs. QGRD - Dividend Comparison
SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.23%, more than QGRD's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 1.36% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.23% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPAQ and QGRD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPAQ and QGRD have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 1.36% for QGRD.
SPAQ is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QGRD is Equity Hedged.
Find the right allocation for SPAQ and QGRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer