SPAQ vs. PINK
SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) and PINK (Simplify Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPAQ returned 5.87%/yr vs 14.42%/yr for PINK. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPAQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PINK.
Performance
SPAQ vs. PINK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPAQ achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly higher than PINK's 2.39% return.
SPAQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PINK
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ vs. PINK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 2.81% | 7.35% | 4.33% | 5.52% |
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 2.39% | 24.34% | 8.81% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPAQ and PINK is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.04 |
SPAQ vs. PINK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPAQ
PINK
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SPAQ
PINK
Industrials
SPAQ
PINK
Basic Materials
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Communication Services
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Consumer Defensive
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Energy
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Healthcare
SPAQ
-
PINK
Real Estate
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Technology
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Utilities
SPAQ
-
PINK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPAQ vs. PINK — Risk / Return Rank
SPAQ
PINK
SPAQ vs. PINK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPAQ | PINK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.87 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | 5.62 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPAQ | PINK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 1.73 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.56 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
SPAQ vs. PINK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPAQ drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum PINK drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAQ and PINK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPAQ | PINK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -18.77% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | -16.81% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.30% | -18.77% | +13.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -2.84% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -6.75% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 5.57% | -4.10% |
Volatility
SPAQ vs. PINK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) is 1.95%, while Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that SPAQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPAQ | PINK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 4.36% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.01% | 13.44% | -8.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 18.17% | -9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 17.57% | -10.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.00% | 17.57% | -10.57% |
SPAQ vs. PINK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPAQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PINK's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPAQ vs. PINK - Dividend Comparison
SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.23%, more than PINK's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.32% | 0.94% | 0.42% | 0.04% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.23% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPAQ and PINK have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PINK has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SPAQ (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAQ dropped -5.30% vs PINK's -18.77%.
On 3-year performance, PINK leads with 14.42% vs 5.87% for SPAQ. On fees, PINK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PINK has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PINK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 0.67% for PINK.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SPAQ and 0.50% for PINK.
PINK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPAQ and PINK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer