PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPAQ vs. PINK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPAQ vs. PINK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAQ achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly higher than PINK's 2.39% return.


SPAQ

1D
0.00%
1M
1.51%
YTD
2.81%
6M
1.64%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
10Y*

PINK

1D
1.24%
1M
7.28%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.11%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAQ vs. PINK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPAQ
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF
2.81%7.35%4.33%5.52%
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
2.39%24.34%8.81%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAQ and PINK is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023

0.04

SPAQ vs. PINK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPAQ
PINK

Financial Services

91.6%
0.0%

Industrials

0.1%
6.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

93.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SPAQ
91.6%
PINK
0.0%

Industrials

SPAQ
0.1%
PINK
6.9%

Basic Materials

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Communication Services

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Consumer Defensive

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Energy

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Healthcare

SPAQ

-

PINK
93.1%

Real Estate

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Technology

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Utilities

SPAQ

-

PINK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPAQ vs. PINK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAQ
SPAQ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SPAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PINK
PINK Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAQ vs. PINK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPAQPINKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.87

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

5.62

-2.23

SPAQ vs. PINK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the PINK Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAQ and PINK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPAQPINKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

1.73

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.56

+0.30

Drawdowns

SPAQ vs. PINK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAQ drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum PINK drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAQ and PINK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPAQPINKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-18.77%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

-16.81%

+11.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.30%

-18.77%

+13.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-2.84%

+2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-6.75%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

5.57%

-4.10%

Volatility

SPAQ vs. PINK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) is 1.95%, while Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that SPAQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPAQPINKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

4.36%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

13.44%

-8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

18.17%

-9.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.00%

17.57%

-10.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

17.57%

-10.57%

SPAQ vs. PINK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PINK's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPAQ vs. PINK - Dividend Comparison

SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.23%, more than PINK's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.67%0.68%0.32%0.94%0.42%0.04%
SPAQ
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF
16.23%16.69%3.00%2.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPAQ and PINK have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PINK has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SPAQ (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAQ dropped -5.30% vs PINK's -18.77%.

On 3-year performance, PINK leads with 14.42% vs 5.87% for SPAQ. On fees, PINK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PINK has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PINK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.

SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 0.67% for PINK.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SPAQ and 0.50% for PINK.

PINK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPAQ and PINK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer