SPAQ vs. EMET

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) and EMET (VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPAQ is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while EMET is a Copper fund tracking the MVIS Global Clean-Tech Metals Index. SPAQ is actively managed, while EMET is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPAQ returned 5.95%/yr vs 16.69%/yr for EMET. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SPAQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for EMET.

Performance

SPAQ vs. EMET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPAQ achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than EMET's 7.69% return.

SPAQ

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 3.62%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMET

• 1D: -3.53%
• 1M: -9.09%
• YTD: 7.69%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 77.20%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPAQ vs. EMET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF	3.29%	7.35%	4.33%	5.32%
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	7.69%	81.22%	-12.81%	-25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SPAQ and EMET is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2023	-0.02

Return for Risk

SPAQ vs. EMET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPAQ

SPAQ Risk / Return Rank: 18
SPAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SPAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SPAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SPAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
SPAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 23

EMET

EMET Risk / Return Rank: 64
EMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EMET Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EMET Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPAQ vs. EMET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) and VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPAQ	EMET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	2.02	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	2.43	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.33	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	3.03	-2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	9.69	-6.89

SPAQ vs. EMET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPAQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the EMET Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPAQ and EMET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPAQ vs. EMET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPAQ drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum EMET drawdown of -53.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPAQ and EMET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPAQ	EMET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-53.05%	+47.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-25.58%	+20.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.30%	-40.50%	+35.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-18.38%	+18.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-24.65%	+24.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	8.00%	-6.61%

Volatility

SPAQ vs. EMET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) is 1.02%, while VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF (EMET) has a volatility of 15.96%. This indicates that SPAQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPAQ	EMET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	15.96%	-14.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.05%	33.78%	-28.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.62%	38.42%	-29.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.95%	33.40%	-26.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.95%	33.40%	-26.45%

SPAQ vs. EMET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPAQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EMET's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPAQ vs. EMET - Dividend Comparison

SPAQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.16%, more than EMET's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMET VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF	1.71%	1.84%	1.89%	2.02%	2.56%
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF	16.16%	16.69%	3.00%	2.60%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPAQ and EMET in my portfolio?

SPAQ and EMET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPAQ or EMET?

EMET has higher volatility (15.96%) compared to SPAQ (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPAQ dropped -5.30% vs EMET's -53.05%.

Which ETF is better, SPAQ or EMET?

On 3-year performance, EMET leads with 16.69% vs 5.95% for SPAQ. On fees, EMET is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPAQ or EMET?

Over the 3-year period, EMET has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPAQ or EMET?

EMET is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPAQ or EMET?

SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.16%, compared with 1.71% for EMET.

What is the main difference between SPAQ and EMET?

SPAQ is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EMET is Copper. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SPAQ and 0.61% for EMET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.