SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L
SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SP5L.L returned 15.13%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for SPXP.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SP5L.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SP5L.L is traded in GBP, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SP5L.L having a 10.62% return and SPXP.L slightly lower at 10.55%.
SP5L.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 29.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 10.62% | 9.50% | 27.61% | 19.99% | -8.84% | 31.19% | 13.92% | 26.93% | 0.03% | 6.79% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SP5L.L and SPXP.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SP5L.L and SPXP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Communication Services
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Healthcare
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Energy
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Utilities
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Real Estate
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SP5L.L
SPXP.L
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SP5L.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.52 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 4.11 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 15.13 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SP5L.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.78 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SP5L.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP5L.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SP5L.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -25.46% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -7.09% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -20.77% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -20.77% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.21% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -3.50% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.93% | +0.07% |
Volatility
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) have volatilities of 2.61% and 2.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SP5L.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.65% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 7.24% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 10.49% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 14.23% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 16.22% | -0.38% |
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SP5L.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SP5L.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SP5L.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SP5L.L and SPXP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SP5L.L.
Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SP5L.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for SP5L.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer