SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI
SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) and IWMO.MI (iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SP5L.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IWMO.MI is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SP5L.L returned 13.60%/yr vs 17.19%/yr for IWMO.MI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SP5L.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWMO.MI.
Performance
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SP5L.L is traded in GBP, while IWMO.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWMO.MI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SP5L.L achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than IWMO.MI's 27.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SP5L.L has underperformed IWMO.MI with an annualized return of 13.60%, while IWMO.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.
SP5L.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
IWMO.MI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 27.77%
- 6M
- 28.56%
- 1Y
- 42.67%
- 3Y*
- 28.36%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 11.25% | 9.50% | 27.60% | 19.99% | -8.84% | 31.19% | 13.92% | 26.93% | 1.00% | -5.12% |
IWMO.MI iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) | 27.77% | 13.66% | 33.16% | 5.75% | -9.25% | 16.01% | 23.68% | 24.32% | 1.82% | 21.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SP5L.L and IWMO.MI is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SP5L.L and IWMO.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI — Risk / Return Rank
SP5L.L
IWMO.MI
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SP5L.L | IWMO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.45 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 4.99 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 18.62 | -4.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SP5L.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, which is greater than IWMO.MI's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP5L.L and IWMO.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SP5L.L | IWMO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -23.31% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -8.85% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -21.09% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -21.09% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | -23.31% | -2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -5.16% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.36% | -0.33% |
Volatility
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) is 3.40%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWMO.MI) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that SP5L.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMO.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SP5L.L | IWMO.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 6.32% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 14.83% | -7.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 17.45% | -6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 17.03% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 17.72% | +0.25% |
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SP5L.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMO.MI's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SP5L.L vs. IWMO.MI - Dividend Comparison
Neither SP5L.L nor IWMO.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SP5L.L and IWMO.MI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWMO.MI.
SP5L.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IWMO.MI is Momentum. SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IWMO.MI tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SP5L.L and 0.25% for IWMO.MI.
Find the right allocation for SP5L.L and IWMO.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer