SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L
SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) and IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SP5L.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IJPH.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SP5L.L returned 13.60%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for IJPH.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SP5L.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPH.L.
Performance
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SP5L.L achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than IJPH.L's 24.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SP5L.L has underperformed IJPH.L with an annualized return of 13.60%, while IJPH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.52% annualized return.
SP5L.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
IJPH.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 8.26%
- YTD
- 24.57%
- 6M
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 58.27%
- 3Y*
- 29.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.85%
- 10Y*
- 15.52%
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 11.25% | 9.50% | 27.60% | 19.99% | -8.84% | 31.19% | 13.92% | 26.93% | 1.00% | -5.12% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 24.57% | 29.37% | 23.82% | 34.19% | -4.30% | 11.94% | 9.27% | 15.94% | -15.89% | 19.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SP5L.L and IJPH.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SP5L.L and IJPH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Financial Services
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Communication Services
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Cyclical
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Healthcare
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Industrials
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Consumer Defensive
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Energy
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Utilities
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Real Estate
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Basic Materials
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L — Risk / Return Rank
SP5L.L
IJPH.L
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SP5L.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.51 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 5.93 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 20.84 | -6.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SP5L.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, smaller than the maximum IJPH.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP5L.L and IJPH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SP5L.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -34.55% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -9.64% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -21.95% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -21.95% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | -34.55% | +9.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -7.45% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.75% | -0.72% |
Volatility
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) is 3.40%, while iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that SP5L.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SP5L.L | IJPH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 4.96% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 15.89% | -8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 20.39% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 19.10% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 19.17% | -1.20% |
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SP5L.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPH.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
SP5L.L vs. IJPH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SP5L.L nor IJPH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SP5L.L and IJPH.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
SP5L.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IJPH.L is Japan Equities. SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SP5L.L and 0.64% for IJPH.L.
Find the right allocation for SP5L.L and IJPH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer