SOXX vs. SHOC
SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) and SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - SOXX tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index while SHOC tracks the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SOXX returned 57.39%/yr vs 53.55%/yr for SHOC. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SOXX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SHOC.
Performance
SOXX vs. SHOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXX achieves a 104.57% return, which is significantly higher than SHOC's 73.38% return.
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
SHOC
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 25.12%
- YTD
- 73.38%
- 6M
- 70.44%
- 1Y
- 149.45%
- 3Y*
- 53.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX vs. SHOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | 0.66% |
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 73.38% | 49.91% | 16.74% | 61.97% | -1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXX and SHOC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SOXX and SHOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOXX vs. SHOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXX
SHOC
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXX
SHOC
Basic Materials
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Communication Services
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Energy
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Financial Services
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Healthcare
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Industrials
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Real Estate
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Utilities
SOXX
-
SHOC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXX vs. SHOC — Risk / Return Rank
SOXX
SHOC
SOXX vs. SHOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXX | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.61 | 4.78 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.36 | 4.84 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.66 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.13 | 10.30 | +1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 46.43 | 38.30 | +8.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXX | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.61 | 4.78 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.55 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
SOXX vs. SHOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than SHOC's maximum drawdown of -37.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXX and SHOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXX | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.21% | -37.54% | -32.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.77% | -14.59% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.36% | -37.54% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.97% | -7.47% | -12.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 3.92% | +0.19% |
Volatility
SOXX vs. SHOC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a higher volatility of 14.03% compared to Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) at 11.47%. This indicates that SOXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXX | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.03% | 11.47% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | 24.61% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.18% | 31.53% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 35.16% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.43% | 35.16% | -1.73% |
SOXX vs. SHOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SHOC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXX vs. SHOC - Dividend Comparison
SOXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than SHOC's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SOXX and SHOC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to SHOC (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXX dropped -70.21% vs SHOC's -37.54%.
On 3-year performance, SOXX leads with 57.39% vs 53.55% for SHOC. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, SHOC has been the lower-risk option at 11.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 57.39% return vs 53.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHOC.
SOXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.
SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index, while SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SOXX and 0.40% for SHOC.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 4.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXX and SHOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer