SOXS vs. BMNZ
SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) and BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - SOXS tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%) while BMNZ tracks the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXS charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BMNZ.
Performance
SOXS vs. BMNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXS achieves a -94.09% return, which is significantly lower than BMNZ's 29.97% return.
SOXS
- 1D
- -11.03%
- 1M
- -41.63%
- YTD
- -94.09%
- 6M
- -93.81%
- 1Y
- -97.64%
- 3Y*
- -87.76%
- 5Y*
- -80.66%
- 10Y*
- -79.95%
BMNZ
- 1D
- 9.79%
- 1M
- 76.32%
- YTD
- 29.97%
- 6M
- 50.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS vs. BMNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -94.09% | -8.86% |
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 29.97% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXS and BMNZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXS vs. BMNZ — Risk / Return Rank
SOXS
BMNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXS vs. BMNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXS | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.64 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXS vs. BMNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BMNZ's maximum drawdown of -70.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXS and BMNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXS | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -70.80% | -29.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -27.23% | -72.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.61% | -50.65% | -41.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 64.48% | — | — |
Volatility
SOXS vs. BMNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXS | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 65.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 100.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.61% | 187.04% | -69.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.53% | 187.04% | -75.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.14% | 187.04% | -84.90% |
SOXS vs. BMNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNZ's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXS vs. BMNZ - Dividend Comparison
SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.55%, while BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 62.55% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXS and BMNZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 62.55%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.
SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SOXS and 1.31% for BMNZ.
Find the right allocation for SOXS and BMNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer