PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXQ vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 96.72% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 23.73% return.


SOXQ

1D
1.42%
1M
32.12%
YTD
96.72%
6M
91.61%
1Y
181.76%
3Y*
59.40%
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
96.72%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%24.82%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXQ and XMMO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.68

The correlation between SOXQ and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SOXQ
XMMO

Technology

100.0%
16.7%

Financial Services

0.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

7.2%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Energy

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

6.3%

Industrials

-

41.1%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

5.8%

Technology

SOXQ
100.0%
XMMO
16.7%

Financial Services

SOXQ
0.0%
XMMO
2.4%

Basic Materials

SOXQ

-

XMMO
7.2%

Communication Services

SOXQ

-

XMMO
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SOXQ

-

XMMO
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SOXQ

-

XMMO
0.5%

Energy

SOXQ

-

XMMO
7.7%

Healthcare

SOXQ

-

XMMO
6.3%

Industrials

SOXQ

-

XMMO
41.1%

Real Estate

SOXQ

-

XMMO
6.1%

Utilities

SOXQ

-

XMMO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXQ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOXQXMMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.43

1.99

+3.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.22

2.77

+2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.35

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.73

4.45

+7.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

45.01

18.21

+26.80

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXQ Sharpe Ratio is 5.43, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXQ and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOXQXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43

1.99

+3.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.58

+0.41

Drawdowns

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXQXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.01%

-55.37%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-8.34%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

-24.93%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-9.45%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

2.04%

+2.02%

Volatility

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that SOXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXQXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

7.82%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.70%

15.54%

+11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.78%

18.71%

+15.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.38%

21.45%

+14.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.38%

22.27%

+14.11%

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOXQ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.26%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXQ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 32.10% for XMMO. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 32.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.

SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while XMMO is Momentum. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.35% for XMMO.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXQ and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer