SOXQ vs. XMMO
SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SOXQ returned 59.40%/yr vs 32.10%/yr for XMMO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXQ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 96.72% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 23.73% return.
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXQ and XMMO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SOXQ and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXQ
XMMO
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SOXQ
XMMO
Financial Services
SOXQ
XMMO
Basic Materials
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Communication Services
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Energy
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Healthcare
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Industrials
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Real Estate
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Utilities
SOXQ
-
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXQ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
SOXQ
XMMO
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.43 | 1.99 | +3.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.22 | 2.77 | +2.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.35 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.73 | 4.45 | +7.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.01 | 18.21 | +26.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43 | 1.99 | +3.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.58 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.01% | -55.37% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -8.34% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.36% | -24.93% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -9.45% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 2.04% | +2.02% |
Volatility
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 7.82%. This indicates that SOXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXQ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.44% | 7.82% | +5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.70% | 15.54% | +11.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 18.71% | +15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 21.45% | +14.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 22.27% | +14.11% |
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXQ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXQ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to XMMO (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 32.10% for XMMO. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 32.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while XMMO is Momentum. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.35% for XMMO.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXQ and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer