SOXQ vs. SSG
SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) and SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOXQ returned 29.96%/yr vs -65.65%/yr for SSG. Their -0.93 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SOXQ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSG.
Performance
SOXQ vs. SSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 72.20% return, which is significantly higher than SSG's -60.38% return.
SOXQ
- 1D
- 6.53%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 53.12%
- YTD
- 72.20%
- 1Y
- 117.36%
- 3Y*
- 49.65%
- 5Y*
- 29.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 30.79%
SSG
- 1D
- -10.60%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- 6M
- -58.06%
- YTD
- -60.38%
- 1Y
- -71.35%
- 3Y*
- -73.14%
- 5Y*
- -65.65%
- 10Y*
- -61.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -48.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $214.44M | $218.73M | $282.51M | |
| $11.57M | $12.13M | $12.68M |
SOXQ vs. SSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 72.20% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -60.38% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -49.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXQ and SSG is -0.89, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | -0.93 |
The correlation between SOXQ and SSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOXQ vs. SSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXQ
SSG
Technology
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXQ
SSG
-
Financial Services
SOXQ
SSG
Basic Materials
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Communication Services
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Energy
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Healthcare
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Industrials
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Real Estate
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Utilities
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXQ vs. SSG — Risk / Return Rank
SOXQ
SSG
SOXQ vs. SSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.81 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | -0.95 | +5.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | -1.58 | +18.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXQ vs. SSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, smaller than the maximum SSG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and SSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.01% | -100.00% | +53.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.56% | -74.90% | +46.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.36% | -98.56% | +59.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.01% | -99.66% | +53.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.72% | -100.00% | +83.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -88.67% | +75.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.05% | 45.08% | -38.03% |
Volatility
SOXQ vs. SSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) is 17.65%, while Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a volatility of 30.17%. This indicates that SOXQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.65% | 30.17% | -12.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.94% | 62.78% | -24.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.80% | 75.42% | -31.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.40% | 79.76% | -41.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.01% | 70.30% | -32.29% |
SOXQ vs. SSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SSG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXQ vs. SSG - Dividend Comparison
SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than SSG's 10.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.30% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 10.29% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXQ and SSG have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (30.17%) compared to SOXQ (17.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs SSG's -100.00%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 29.96% vs -65.65% for SSG. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SOXQ has been the lower-risk option at 17.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 29.96% return vs -65.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 10.29%, compared with 0.30% for SOXQ.
SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while SSG is Leveraged Equities. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.95% for SSG.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXQ and SSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer