SOXQ vs. SSG
SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) and SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SOXQ returned 59.40%/yr vs -74.84%/yr for SSG. At a correlation of -0.92, they often move in opposite directions. SOXQ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSG.
Performance
SOXQ vs. SSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 96.72% return, which is significantly higher than SSG's -60.94% return.
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSG
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -33.91%
- YTD
- -60.94%
- 6M
- -61.42%
- 1Y
- -81.06%
- 3Y*
- -74.84%
- 5Y*
- -66.94%
- 10Y*
- -62.12%
SOXQ vs. SSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -60.94% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -48.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXQ and SSG is -0.84, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | -0.92 |
The correlation between SOXQ and SSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOXQ vs. SSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXQ
SSG
Technology
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXQ
SSG
-
Financial Services
SOXQ
SSG
Basic Materials
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Communication Services
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Energy
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Healthcare
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Industrials
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Real Estate
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Utilities
SOXQ
-
SSG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXQ vs. SSG — Risk / Return Rank
SOXQ
SSG
SOXQ vs. SSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.43 | -1.32 | +6.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.22 | -3.11 | +8.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 0.67 | +1.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.73 | -1.00 | +12.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.01 | -1.60 | +46.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43 | -1.32 | +6.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | -0.79 | +1.77 |
Drawdowns
SOXQ vs. SSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, smaller than the maximum SSG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and SSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.01% | -100.00% | +53.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -81.36% | +65.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.36% | -98.49% | +59.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -100.00% | +100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -88.59% | +75.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 50.50% | -46.44% |
Volatility
SOXQ vs. SSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) is 13.44%, while Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a volatility of 21.44%. This indicates that SOXQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXQ | SSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.44% | 21.44% | -8.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.70% | 47.41% | -20.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.78% | 61.80% | -28.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 77.33% | -40.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 68.97% | -32.59% |
SOXQ vs. SSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SSG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXQ vs. SSG - Dividend Comparison
SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SSG's 13.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 13.36% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXQ and SSG have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (21.44%) compared to SOXQ (13.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs SSG's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs -74.84% for SSG. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SOXQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs -74.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 13.36%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while SSG is Leveraged Equities. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.95% for SSG.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXQ and SSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer