PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXQ vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 90.62% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.


SOXQ

1D
-7.82%
1M
10.55%
YTD
90.62%
6M
87.99%
1Y
158.27%
3Y*
57.61%
5Y*
34.04%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
90.62%43.11%20.16%16.86%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXQ and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXQ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOXQIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

2.22

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.22

16.56

-6.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.68

58.67

-22.00

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXQ Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is comparable to the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXQ and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXQIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.01%

-0.90%

-45.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-0.27%

-15.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.82%

-0.08%

-7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-0.10%

-12.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

0.08%

+4.25%

Volatility

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a higher volatility of 22.04% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that SOXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXQIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.04%

0.17%

+21.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.49%

0.67%

+31.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.78%

0.89%

+37.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.34%

1.56%

+35.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.24%

1.56%

+35.68%

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SOXQ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXQ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (22.04%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, SOXQ leads with 158.27% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 158.27% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.

SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 4.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXQ and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer