SOXQ vs. FLTW

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while FLTW is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOXQ returned 34.23%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for FLTW. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 89.01% return, which is significantly higher than FLTW's 65.68% return.

SOXQ

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 11.31%
• YTD: 89.01%
• 6M: 90.35%
• 1Y: 155.88%
• 3Y*: 54.65%
• 5Y*: 34.23%
• 10Y*: —

FLTW

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 9.23%
• YTD: 65.68%
• 6M: 71.97%
• 1Y: 100.51%
• 3Y*: 39.63%
• 5Y*: 20.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF	89.01%	43.11%	20.16%	66.74%	-35.59%	25.19%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	65.68%	32.00%	16.68%	30.05%	-27.51%	7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXQ and FLTW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021	0.70

The correlation between SOXQ and FLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOXQ	FLTW
Technology	100.0%	75.6%
Financial Services	0.0%	12.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.9%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.9%
Energy	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	0.6%
Industrials	-	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SOXQ vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXQ

SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOXQ	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.26	3.62	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.25	4.02	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.58	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.06	9.29	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.55	27.95	+8.60

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXQ Sharpe Ratio is 4.26, which is comparable to the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXQ and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOXQ	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.01%	-38.00%	-8.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.59%	-10.87%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.36%	-26.45%	-12.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.01%	-38.00%	-8.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-4.47%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-8.42%	-4.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	3.61%	+0.68%

Volatility

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a higher volatility of 18.79% compared to Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) at 15.27%. This indicates that SOXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOXQ	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.79%	15.27%	+3.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.67%	23.85%	+6.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.79%	27.98%	+8.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.89%	22.90%	+13.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.87%	22.03%	+14.84%

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SOXQ and FLTW have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SOXQ vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than FLTW's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.51%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF	0.27%	0.50%	0.68%	0.87%	1.36%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOXQ and FLTW in my portfolio?

SOXQ and FLTW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOXQ or FLTW?

SOXQ has higher volatility (18.79%) compared to FLTW (15.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

Which ETF is better, SOXQ or FLTW?

On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 34.23% vs 20.89% for FLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, FLTW has been the lower-risk option at 15.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOXQ or FLTW?

Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 34.23% return vs 20.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOXQ or FLTW?

SOXQ and FLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOXQ or FLTW?

FLTW has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.

What is the main difference between SOXQ and FLTW?

SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 3.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.