SOXL vs. INTW
SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SOXL is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, SOXL returned 1196.88% vs 1966.96% for INTW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXL charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
SOXL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 564.50% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 778.52% return.
SOXL
- 1D
- 19.43%
- 1M
- 83.88%
- YTD
- 564.50%
- 6M
- 623.92%
- 1Y
- 1,196.88%
- 3Y*
- 124.34%
- 5Y*
- 50.47%
- 10Y*
- 65.95%
INTW
- 1D
- 20.68%
- 1M
- 34.70%
- YTD
- 778.52%
- 6M
- 804.94%
- 1Y
- 1,966.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 564.50% | 53.62% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 778.52% | 60.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXL and INTW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SOXL and INTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOXL vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXL
INTW
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXL
INTW
Basic Materials
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Communication Services
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Energy
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Financial Services
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Healthcare
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Industrials
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Real Estate
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Utilities
SOXL
-
INTW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
SOXL
INTW
SOXL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.66 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 27.84 | 40.37 | -12.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 89.88 | 91.67 | -1.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -60.58% | -29.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.47% | -49.34% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.82% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -29.80% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.44% | 21.69% | -8.25% |
Volatility
SOXL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 62.74% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) at 54.63%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 62.74% | 54.63% | +8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 96.77% | 118.15% | -21.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 114.08% | 149.39% | -35.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.76% | 148.63% | -38.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.44% | 148.63% | -48.19% |
SOXL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXL and INTW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (62.74%) compared to INTW (54.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs INTW's -60.58%.
On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1966.96% vs 1196.88% for SOXL. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, INTW has been the lower-risk option at 54.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1966.96% return vs 1196.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 1.50% for INTW.
INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.34 vs 10.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXL and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer