SOXL vs. CONL

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) and CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SOXL is passively managed, while CONL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SOXL returned 124.34%/yr vs -8.64%/yr for CONL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOXL charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CONL.

Performance

SOXL vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 564.50% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -63.14% return.

SOXL

• 1D: 19.43%
• 1M: 61.25%
• YTD: 564.50%
• 6M: 569.44%
• 1Y: 1,196.88%
• 3Y*: 124.34%
• 5Y*: 50.47%
• 10Y*: 65.95%

CONL

• 1D: -2.17%
• 1M: -30.59%
• YTD: -63.14%
• 6M: -68.88%
• 1Y: -83.91%
• 3Y*: -8.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXL vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF	564.50%	54.91%	-12.31%	226.98%	-52.60%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-63.14%	-58.49%	4.23%	641.63%	-80.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXL and CONL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.46

SOXL vs. CONL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOXL	CONL
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SOXL vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXL

SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 97
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXL vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOXL	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.61	-0.62	+11.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.44	-0.95	+5.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	0.89	+0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	27.84	-0.91	+28.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	89.88	-1.23	+91.11

SOXL vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXL Sharpe Ratio is 10.61, which is higher than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXL and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOXL vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CONL drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOXL	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.46%	-94.36%	+3.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.47%	-92.57%	+49.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-87.88%	-94.36%	+6.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-93.66%	+93.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.96%	-56.37%	+21.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.44%	68.46%	-55.02%

Volatility

SOXL vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 62.74% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) at 36.22%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOXL	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	62.74%	36.22%	+26.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	96.77%	102.76%	-5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.08%	139.79%	-25.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	109.76%	149.68%	-39.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.44%	149.68%	-49.24%

SOXL vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOXL vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF	0.03%	0.34%	1.18%	0.51%	1.07%	0.04%	0.05%	0.38%	1.30%	0.09%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOXL and CONL in my portfolio?

SOXL and CONL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOXL or CONL?

SOXL has higher volatility (62.74%) compared to CONL (36.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs CONL's -94.36%.

Which ETF is better, SOXL or CONL?

On 3-year performance, SOXL leads with 124.34% vs -8.64% for CONL. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CONL has been the lower-risk option at 36.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOXL or CONL?

Over the 3-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 124.34% return vs -8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOXL or CONL?

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOXL or CONL?

SOXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

What is the main difference between SOXL and CONL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 1.15% for CONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.61 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.