SOVF vs. CTEF
SOVF (Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOVF returned -2.03% vs 85.20% for CTEF. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
SOVF vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOVF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 39.02% return.
SOVF
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -3.34%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 15.76%
- YTD
- 39.02%
- 6M
- 37.29%
- 1Y
- 85.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOVF vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund | -2.69% | 0.63% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 39.02% | 33.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOVF and CTEF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOVF vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
SOVF
CTEF
SOVF vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOVF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.61 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 5.71 | -5.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 26.45 | -26.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOVF vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOVF drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOVF and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOVF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.74% | -15.00% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -15.00% | +0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.39% | 0.00% | -14.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -1.75% | -5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 3.23% | +3.77% |
Volatility
SOVF vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund (SOVF) is 3.78%, while Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that SOVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOVF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 8.68% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 19.03% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 22.47% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 22.47% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 22.47% | -5.27% |
SOVF vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOVF vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
SOVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than CTEF's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.05% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOVF Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund | 0.79% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOVF and CTEF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEF has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to SOVF (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOVF dropped -21.74% vs CTEF's -15.00%.
On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 85.20% vs -2.03% for SOVF. On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SOVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 85.20% return vs -2.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SOVF.
SOVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.05% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Sovereign's and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOVF and 0.45% for CTEF.
CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOVF and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer