PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOUN vs. EOSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SOUN vs. EOSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOUN achieves a -30.79% return, which is significantly higher than EOSE's -47.12% return.


SOUN

1D
-1.43%
1M
-18.05%
YTD
-30.79%
6M
-40.77%
1Y
-27.14%
3Y*
29.87%
5Y*
10Y*

EOSE

1D
-2.26%
1M
-26.81%
YTD
-47.12%
6M
-59.16%
1Y
45.67%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
-21.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOUN vs. EOSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
-30.79%-49.75%835.85%19.77%-79.70%
EOSE
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc
-47.12%135.80%345.87%-26.35%-31.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SOUN and EOSE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SOUN:

$2.34B

EOSE:

$3.30B

EPS

SOUN:

-$0.43

EOSE:

-$1.45

PS Ratio

SOUN:

14.72

EOSE:

12.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

SOUN:

$183.99M

EOSE:

$160.71M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SOUN:

$69.84M

EOSE:

-$163.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

SOUN:

-$124.47M

EOSE:

-$858.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOUN vs. EOSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOUN
SOUN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SOUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOUN Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SOUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

EOSE
EOSE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EOSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EOSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOSE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOUN vs. EOSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOUNEOSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.17

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

0.60

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

1.16

-1.76

SOUN vs. EOSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the EOSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOUN and EOSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOUN vs. EOSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOUN drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, roughly equal to the maximum EOSE drawdown of -97.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOUN and EOSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOUNEOSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.55%

-97.88%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.43%

-77.10%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.65%

-87.18%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.52%

-80.09%

+8.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.93%

-72.37%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.29%

39.66%

+5.63%

Volatility

SOUN vs. EOSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) is 17.69%, while Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) has a volatility of 31.08%. This indicates that SOUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOUNEOSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

31.08%

-13.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.15%

91.90%

-39.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.70%

115.13%

-34.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.27%

117.06%

+19.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.27%

112.92%

+23.35%

Dividends

SOUN vs. EOSE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOUN nor EOSE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SOUN vs. EOSE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SoundHound AI, Inc. and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M202120222023202420252026
44.20M
56.96M
(SOUN) Total Revenue
(EOSE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SOUN and EOSE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EOSE has higher volatility (31.08%) compared to SOUN (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOUN dropped -93.55% vs EOSE's -97.88%.

EOSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOUN and EOSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer