SOPIX vs. RYGBX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund (SOPIX) and Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX).
SOPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. RYGBX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Jan 2, 1994.
Performance
SOPIX vs. RYGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SOPIX vs. RYGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOPIX ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund | 6.77% | -15.80% | -23.82% | -31.85% | 34.73% | -25.69% | -42.92% | -28.29% | -3.07% | -25.24% |
RYGBX Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund | -1.11% | 2.19% | -12.81% | -1.05% | -40.90% | -7.28% | 21.93% | 17.50% | -5.20% | 9.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOPIX achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly higher than RYGBX's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SOPIX has underperformed RYGBX with an annualized return of -18.76%, while RYGBX has yielded a comparatively higher -4.33% annualized return.
SOPIX
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- -16.86%
- 3Y*
- -17.63%
- 5Y*
- -13.19%
- 10Y*
- -18.76%
RYGBX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- -4.34%
- 3Y*
- -6.59%
- 5Y*
- -10.30%
- 10Y*
- -4.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SOPIX vs. RYGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RYGBX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SOPIX vs. RYGBX — Risk / Return Rank
SOPIX
RYGBX
SOPIX vs. RYGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund (SOPIX) and Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOPIX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | -0.25 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | -0.25 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.97 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.17 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | -0.32 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOPIX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | -0.25 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 | -0.52 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.84 | -0.22 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 0.08 | -0.85 |
Correlation
The correlation between SOPIX and RYGBX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SOPIX vs. RYGBX - Dividend Comparison
SOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than RYGBX's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOPIX ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund | 2.01% | 2.14% | 0.00% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYGBX Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund | 3.51% | 3.59% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.69% | 0.71% | 46.47% | 5.00% | 1.51% | 1.45% | 5.62% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
SOPIX vs. RYGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.92%, which is greater than RYGBX's maximum drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOPIX and RYGBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOPIX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.92% | -62.42% | -36.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.92% | -11.73% | -22.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.43% | -55.36% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.41% | -62.42% | -26.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.80% | -58.85% | -39.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.97% | -19.31% | -56.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.25% | 6.15% | +21.10% |
Volatility
SOPIX vs. RYGBX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Short NASDAQ-100 Fund (SOPIX) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX) at 4.24%. This indicates that SOPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SOPIX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 4.24% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 7.69% | +5.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 13.47% | +11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 19.83% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 19.36% | +3.09% |