SOLZ vs. ETHV
SOLZ (Solana ETF) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOLZ is actively managed, while ETHV is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLZ returned -53.09% vs -33.62% for ETHV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SOLZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
SOLZ vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -38.47% return, which is significantly higher than ETHV's -41.51% return.
SOLZ
- 1D
- -4.91%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- 6M
- -43.61%
- YTD
- -38.47%
- 1Y
- -53.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- 6M
- -44.58%
- YTD
- -41.51%
- 1Y
- -33.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLZ vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLZ Solana ETF | -38.47% | -14.53% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -41.51% | 45.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLZ and ETHV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SOLZ and ETHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLZ vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
SOLZ
ETHV
SOLZ vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOLZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.96 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | -0.50 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -0.79 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLZ vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, which is greater than ETHV's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.68% | -67.88% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.68% | -67.88% | -7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.27% | -64.14% | -6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.73% | -34.37% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.89% | 42.48% | +8.41% |
Volatility
SOLZ vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a higher volatility of 23.12% compared to VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) at 17.29%. This indicates that SOLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLZ | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.12% | 17.29% | +5.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.77% | 46.94% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.61% | 68.71% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.59% | 72.08% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.59% | 72.08% | +4.51% |
SOLZ vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLZ vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while ETHV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOLZ Solana ETF | 3.49% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLZ and ETHV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOLZ has higher volatility (23.12%) compared to ETHV (17.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLZ dropped -75.68% vs ETHV's -67.88%.
On 1-year performance, ETHV leads with -33.62% vs -53.09% for SOLZ. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 17.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHV has performed better with a -33.62% return vs -53.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SOLZ.
SOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for ETHV.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SOLZ and 0.20% for ETHV.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOLZ and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer