SOLX.TO vs. BFJL
SOLX.TO (CI Galaxy Solana ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by CI, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLX.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.
Performance
SOLX.TO vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SOLX.TO is traded in CAD, while BFJL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BFJL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLX.TO achieves a -41.33% return, which is significantly lower than BFJL's -4.06% return.
SOLX.TO
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -41.33%
- 6M
- -40.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFJL
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- -4.06%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- -10.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLX.TO vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | -41.33% | -40.68% |
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | -4.06% | -9.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLX.TO and BFJL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLX.TO vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLX.TO vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLX.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.14%, which is greater than BFJL's maximum drawdown of -22.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLX.TO and BFJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLX.TO | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.14% | -22.89% | -52.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.16% | -19.70% | -51.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.83% | -12.87% | -36.96% |
Volatility
SOLX.TO vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLX.TO | BFJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.08% | 14.00% | +62.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.08% | 14.00% | +62.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.08% | 14.00% | +62.08% |
SOLX.TO vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLX.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLX.TO vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison
SOLX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFJL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July | 1.46% | 1.35% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.83% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLX.TO and BFJL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFJL is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFJL is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLX.TO.
SOLX.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: CI and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLX.TO and 0.90% for BFJL.
Find the right allocation for SOLX.TO and BFJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer