SOLT vs. ZVOL
SOLT (2x Solana ETF) and ZVOL (Volatility Premium Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLT is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while ZVOL is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid Term Futures Inverse Daily Index. SOLT is actively managed, while ZVOL is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLT returned -90.29% vs 17.34% for ZVOL. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SOLT charges 1.85%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZVOL.
Performance
SOLT vs. ZVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLT achieves a -74.74% return, which is significantly lower than ZVOL's 5.62% return.
SOLT
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- 6M
- -59.46%
- YTD
- -74.74%
- 1Y
- -90.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -79.62%
ZVOL
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 17.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | $8.18M | $11.07M | $16.04M |
| $470.87K | $413.94K | $372.51K |
SOLT vs. ZVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | -74.74% | -55.52% |
ZVOL Volatility Premium Plus ETF | 5.62% | -3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLT and ZVOL is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLT vs. ZVOL — Risk / Return Rank
SOLT
ZVOL
SOLT vs. ZVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOLT | ZVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.17 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 1.06 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 3.39 | -4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLT vs. ZVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLT drawdown since its inception was -96.28%, which is greater than ZVOL's maximum drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLT and ZVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLT | ZVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.28% | -37.25% | -59.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.28% | -16.46% | -79.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.23% | -15.87% | -79.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.29% | -13.63% | -44.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 77.45% | 5.12% | +72.33% |
Volatility
SOLT vs. ZVOL - Volatility Comparison
2x Solana ETF (SOLT) has a higher volatility of 21.16% compared to Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) at 3.17%. This indicates that SOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLT | ZVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.16% | 3.17% | +17.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 98.76% | 13.58% | +85.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 145.02% | 18.65% | +126.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.50% | 28.70% | +119.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.50% | 28.70% | +119.80% |
SOLT vs. ZVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLT has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZVOL's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLT vs. ZVOL - Dividend Comparison
SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, less than ZVOL's 74.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | 5.64% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZVOL Volatility Premium Plus ETF | 74.21% | 53.44% | 30.68% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLT and ZVOL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOLT has higher volatility (21.16%) compared to ZVOL (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLT dropped -96.28% vs ZVOL's -37.25%.
On 1-year performance, ZVOL leads with 17.34% vs -90.29% for SOLT. On fees, ZVOL is cheaper at 1.35% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZVOL has performed better with a 17.34% return vs -90.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZVOL is cheaper with a 1.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.
ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 74.21%, compared with 5.64% for SOLT.
SOLT is categorized as Blockchain, while ZVOL is Volatility. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for SOLT and 1.35% for ZVOL.
ZVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOLT and ZVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer