PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLT vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOLT vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLT achieves a -77.47% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 80.39% return.


SOLT

1D
-10.71%
1M
-37.12%
YTD
-77.47%
6M
-77.71%
1Y
-89.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
-13.49%
1M
12.90%
YTD
80.39%
6M
88.25%
1Y
241.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLT vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOLT
2x Solana ETF
-77.47%-55.52%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
80.39%154.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLT and TSMG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLT vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLT
SOLT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLT vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOLTTSMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.39

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

6.90

-7.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

22.04

-23.30

SOLT vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLT and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOLT vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLT drawdown since its inception was -96.28%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLT and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLTTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.28%

-63.67%

-32.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.28%

-35.29%

-60.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.74%

-13.49%

-82.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.92%

-16.65%

-38.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.78%

11.03%

+59.75%

Volatility

SOLT vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

2x Solana ETF (SOLT) has a higher volatility of 43.69% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) at 33.00%. This indicates that SOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOLTTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.69%

33.00%

+10.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.76%

60.76%

+44.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.24%

76.78%

+71.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.89%

83.21%

+68.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

151.89%

83.21%

+68.68%

SOLT vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLT has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOLT vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than TSMG's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025
SOLT
2x Solana ETF
6.91%1.22%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
6.37%11.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOLT and TSMG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOLT has higher volatility (43.69%) compared to TSMG (33.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLT dropped -96.28% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 241.80% vs -89.02% for SOLT. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSMG has been the lower-risk option at 33.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 241.80% return vs -89.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.

SOLT has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 6.37% for TSMG.

SOLT is categorized as Blockchain, while TSMG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for SOLT and 0.75% for TSMG.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOLT and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer