SOLT vs. OBTC
SOLT (2x Solana ETF) and OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLT is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while OBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitcoin (BTC). SOLT is actively managed, while OBTC is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLT returned -89.02% vs -32.71% for OBTC. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SOLT charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for OBTC.
Performance
SOLT vs. OBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLT achieves a -77.47% return, which is significantly lower than OBTC's -28.85% return.
SOLT
- 1D
- -10.71%
- 1M
- -37.12%
- YTD
- -77.47%
- 6M
- -77.71%
- 1Y
- -89.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -17.79%
- YTD
- -28.85%
- 6M
- -28.90%
- 1Y
- -32.71%
- 3Y*
- 41.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SOLT vs. OBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | -77.47% | -55.52% |
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -28.85% | 9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLT and OBTC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SOLT and OBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLT vs. OBTC — Risk / Return Rank
SOLT
OBTC
SOLT vs. OBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOLT | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.90 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.68 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -1.21 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLT vs. OBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLT drawdown since its inception was -96.28%, roughly equal to the maximum OBTC drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLT and OBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLT | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.28% | -94.50% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.28% | -48.14% | -48.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -83.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.74% | -64.47% | -31.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.92% | -69.52% | +14.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.78% | 27.10% | +43.68% |
Volatility
SOLT vs. OBTC - Volatility Comparison
2x Solana ETF (SOLT) has a higher volatility of 43.69% compared to Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) at 12.93%. This indicates that SOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLT | OBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.69% | 12.93% | +30.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.76% | 34.93% | +69.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.24% | 44.86% | +103.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.89% | 57.33% | +94.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.89% | 76.86% | +75.03% |
SOLT vs. OBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLT has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OBTC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLT vs. OBTC - Dividend Comparison
SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, while OBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | 6.91% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLT and OBTC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOLT has higher volatility (43.69%) compared to OBTC (12.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLT dropped -96.28% vs OBTC's -94.50%.
On 1-year performance, OBTC leads with -32.71% vs -89.02% for SOLT. On fees, OBTC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 12.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OBTC has performed better with a -32.71% return vs -89.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OBTC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.
SOLT has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 0.00% for OBTC.
SOLT is categorized as Blockchain, while OBTC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Osprey Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for SOLT and 0.49% for OBTC.
SOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOLT and OBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer