SOLT vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SOLT (2x Solana ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLT is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. SOLT is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLT returned -90.57% vs 4.26% for BSCQ. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SOLT charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLT achieves a -79.35% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.73% return.

SOLT

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -41.08%
• YTD: -79.35%
• 6M: -78.68%
• 1Y: -90.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOLT 2x Solana ETF	-79.35%	-55.52%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.73%	3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLT and BSCQ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

SOLT vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLT

SOLT Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOLT	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	7.10	-7.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	15.91	-17.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	3.51	-2.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	41.89	-42.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	183.04	-184.31

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 7.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLT and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLT drawdown since its inception was -96.28%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLT and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOLT	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.28%	-16.50%	-79.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.28%	-0.10%	-96.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.10%	0.00%	-96.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.18%	-2.83%	-52.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.29%	0.02%	+71.27%

Volatility

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

2x Solana ETF (SOLT) has a higher volatility of 43.85% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.12%. This indicates that SOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOLT	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.85%	0.12%	+43.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	103.65%	0.41%	+103.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	148.34%	0.60%	+147.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	151.58%	3.29%	+148.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	151.58%	4.75%	+146.83%

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLT has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOLT vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.11%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
SOLT 2x Solana ETF	7.54%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOLT and BSCQ in my portfolio?

SOLT and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOLT or BSCQ?

SOLT has higher volatility (43.85%) compared to BSCQ (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLT dropped -96.28% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

Which ETF is better, SOLT or BSCQ?

On 1-year performance, BSCQ leads with 4.26% vs -90.57% for SOLT. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOLT or BSCQ?

Over the 1-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 4.26% return vs -90.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOLT or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOLT or BSCQ?

SOLT has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 4.11% for BSCQ.

What is the main difference between SOLT and BSCQ?

SOLT is categorized as Blockchain, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for SOLT and 0.10% for BSCQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.10 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.