SOLR vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SOLR (SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF) and MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

SOLR vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SOLR) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLR achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 17.58% return.

SOLR

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 7.74%
• YTD: 19.19%
• 6M: 18.35%
• 1Y: 42.02%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: 4.70%
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLR vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOLR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF	19.19%	0.72%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLR and MLPI is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

SOLR vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLR

SOLR Risk / Return Rank: 62
SOLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SOLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SOLR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SOLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SOLR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLR vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SOLR) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SOLR	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SOLR	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	3.49	-3.13

Drawdowns

SOLR vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLR drawdown since its inception was -39.46%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLR and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOLR	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.46%	-5.38%	-34.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-3.84%	+3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.59%	-1.27%	-14.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SOLR	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.46%	13.05%	+6.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.16%	13.05%	+9.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.73%	13.05%	+9.68%

SOLR vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOLR vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

SOLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than MLPI's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOLR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF	0.56%	0.67%	0.93%	0.42%	1.29%	2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOLR and MLPI in my portfolio?

SOLR and MLPI have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SOLR or MLPI?

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOLR or MLPI?

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SOLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOLR or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 0.56% for SOLR.

What is the main difference between SOLR and MLPI?

They also come from different issuers: SmartETFs and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SOLR and 0.68% for MLPI.