PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLR vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOLR vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SOLR) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLR achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


SOLR

1D
-0.46%
1M
7.74%
YTD
19.19%
6M
18.35%
1Y
42.02%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLR vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SOLR
SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF
19.19%26.72%-12.41%-0.78%-11.87%11.48%19.67%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLR and DBE is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.08

The correlation between SOLR and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLR vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLR
SOLR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SOLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLR vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SOLR) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOLRDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

5.89

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

11.53

-1.29

SOLR vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLR and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOLRDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.43

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.67

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.09

+0.26

Drawdowns

SOLR vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLR drawdown since its inception was -39.46%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLR and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLRDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.46%

-86.69%

+47.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-14.41%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.66%

-23.89%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.46%

-38.74%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-30.27%

+29.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.59%

-57.31%

+41.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

7.35%

-3.24%

Volatility

SOLR vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SOLR) is 7.61%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that SOLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOLRDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

12.95%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.45%

30.86%

-15.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

34.97%

-15.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.16%

29.39%

-7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.73%

28.33%

-5.60%

SOLR vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOLR vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

SOLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
SOLR
SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF
0.56%0.67%0.93%0.42%1.29%2.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOLR and DBE have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to SOLR (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLR dropped -39.46% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.66% vs 4.70% for SOLR. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, SOLR has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SOLR.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.56% for SOLR.

SOLR is categorized as Energy Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: SmartETFs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SOLR and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOLR and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer