SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO
SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) and YTSL.NEO (Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLL.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while YTSL.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLL.TO returned -56.74% vs 49.81% for YTSL.NEO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLL.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for YTSL.NEO.
Performance
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -44.92% return, which is significantly lower than YTSL.NEO's -7.41% return.
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -20.42%
- YTD
- -44.92%
- 6M
- -51.48%
- 1Y
- -56.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YTSL.NEO
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 7.81%
- YTD
- -7.41%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 49.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -44.92% | -7.64% |
YTSL.NEO Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -7.41% | 123.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLL.TO and YTSL.NEO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLL.TO
YTSL.NEO
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLL.TO | YTSL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.21 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 2.02 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 5.28 | -6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLL.TO | YTSL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 1.04 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.57 | -1.21 |
Drawdowns
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than YTSL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and YTSL.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLL.TO | YTSL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.76% | -58.40% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.76% | -24.81% | -47.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.76% | -8.46% | -64.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -20.46% | -14.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.42% | 9.59% | +35.83% |
Volatility
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) at 12.78%. This indicates that SOLL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YTSL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLL.TO | YTSL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 12.78% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.07% | 29.36% | +19.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.56% | 48.20% | +24.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 61.82% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 61.82% | +9.33% |
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than YTSL.NEO's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLL.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
SOLL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YTSL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YTSL.NEO Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 46.17% | 36.11% | 12.80% | 24.07% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLL.TO and YTSL.NEO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOLL.TO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOLL.TO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for YTSL.NEO.
SOLL.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while YTSL.NEO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 1.65% for YTSL.NEO.
Find the right allocation for SOLL.TO and YTSL.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer