SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO
SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) and MNY.TO (Purpose Cash Management Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLL.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while MNY.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLL.TO returned -56.74% vs 2.59% for MNY.TO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SOLL.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for MNY.TO.
Performance
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -44.92% return, which is significantly lower than MNY.TO's 0.96% return.
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -20.42%
- YTD
- -44.92%
- 6M
- -51.48%
- 1Y
- -56.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNY.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -44.92% | -7.64% |
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 0.96% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLL.TO and MNY.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLL.TO
MNY.TO
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLL.TO | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -53.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 22.36 | -21.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 65.14 | -65.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 607.07 | -608.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLL.TO | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 16.13 | -16.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 11.02 | -11.65 |
Drawdowns
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and MNY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLL.TO | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.76% | -0.24% | -72.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.76% | -0.04% | -72.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.76% | 0.00% | -72.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -0.00% | -34.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.42% | 0.00% | +45.42% |
Volatility
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 0.03%. This indicates that SOLL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLL.TO | MNY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 0.03% | +16.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.07% | 0.12% | +48.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.56% | 0.16% | +72.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 0.37% | +70.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 0.37% | +70.78% |
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MNY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLL.TO vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison
SOLL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund | 2.56% | 2.93% | 4.71% | 4.85% | 1.47% |
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLL.TO and MNY.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNY.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNY.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
SOLL.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNY.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 0.22% for MNY.TO.
Find the right allocation for SOLL.TO and MNY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer