SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO
SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) and BTCC-B.TO (Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLL.TO returned -56.74% vs -39.17% for BTCC-B.TO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SOLL.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for BTCC-B.TO.
Performance
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -44.92% return, which is significantly lower than BTCC-B.TO's -26.65% return.
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -20.42%
- YTD
- -44.92%
- 6M
- -51.48%
- 1Y
- -56.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC-B.TO
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -20.49%
- YTD
- -26.65%
- 6M
- -31.97%
- 1Y
- -39.17%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -44.92% | -7.64% |
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units | -26.65% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLL.TO and BTCC-B.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SOLL.TO and BTCC-B.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLL.TO
BTCC-B.TO
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLL.TO | BTCC-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.85 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.78 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.34 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLL.TO | BTCC-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | -0.92 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.07 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.76%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown of -75.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and BTCC-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLL.TO | BTCC-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.76% | -75.12% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.76% | -50.47% | -22.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.76% | -49.90% | -22.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -32.81% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.42% | 29.32% | +16.10% |
Volatility
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) at 9.34%. This indicates that SOLL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCC-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLL.TO | BTCC-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 9.34% | +7.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.07% | 33.04% | +16.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.56% | 42.52% | +30.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 53.74% | +17.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.15% | 54.94% | +16.21% |
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCC-B.TO's 1.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLL.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOLL.TO nor BTCC-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLL.TO and BTCC-B.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOLL.TO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOLL.TO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO.
Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 1.33% for BTCC-B.TO.
Find the right allocation for SOLL.TO and BTCC-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer