SOGP vs. SES
SOGP (Lizhi Inc) and SES (SES AI Corp) are both stocks. SOGP operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while SES operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, SOGP returned -27.24%/yr vs -43.23%/yr for SES. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOGP vs. SES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOGP achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly higher than SES's -67.66% return.
SOGP
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -15.27%
- 6M
- -19.68%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 1Y
- 125.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- -27.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -29.41%
SES
- 1D
- -8.73%
- 1M
- -47.55%
- 6M
- -74.80%
- YTD
- -67.66%
- 1Y
- -51.88%
- 3Y*
- -42.04%
- 5Y*
- -43.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -41.55%
SOGP vs. SES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOGP Lizhi Inc | -6.75% | 465.48% | -20.80% | -56.51% | -65.95% | -77.05% |
SES SES AI Corp | -67.66% | -17.81% | 19.67% | -41.90% | -68.34% | -5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOGP and SES is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
SOGP:
$47.23M
SES:
$212.16M
SOGP:
CN¥2.07B
SES:
$21.92M
SOGP:
CN¥585.38M
SES:
$7.97M
SOGP:
-CN¥138.59M
SES:
-$68.11M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOGP vs. SES — Risk / Return Rank
SOGP
SES
SOGP vs. SES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lizhi Inc (SOGP) and SES AI Corp (SES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOGP | SES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.98 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | -0.62 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | -1.02 | +3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOGP vs. SES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOGP drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, roughly equal to the maximum SES drawdown of -97.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOGP and SES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOGP | SES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.25% | -97.58% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.70% | -83.55% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.52% | -91.41% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.76% | -97.58% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.77% | -94.77% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.45% | -66.23% | -18.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.11% | 50.87% | +3.24% |
Volatility
SOGP vs. SES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lizhi Inc (SOGP) is 18.83%, while SES AI Corp (SES) has a volatility of 24.13%. This indicates that SOGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOGP | SES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.83% | 24.13% | -5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.10% | 77.94% | -29.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 269.77% | 107.24% | +162.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 156.40% | 115.26% | +41.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.50% | 111.05% | +48.45% |
Dividends
SOGP vs. SES - Dividend Comparison
SOGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.91%, while SES has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SES SES AI Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOGP Lizhi Inc | 21.91% | 8.61% |
Financials
SOGP vs. SES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lizhi Inc and SES AI Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SOGP and SES have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SES has higher volatility (24.13%) compared to SOGP (18.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOGP dropped -99.25% vs SES's -97.58%.
SOGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOGP and SES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer