SOFR vs. TMB
SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) and TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. SOFR is passively managed, while TMB is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. SOFR charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMB.
Performance
SOFR vs. TMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SOFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOFR vs. TMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 0.03% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOFR and TMB is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOFR vs. TMB — Risk / Return Rank
SOFR
TMB
SOFR vs. TMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOFR | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.66 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.86 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOFR | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.96 | 15.15 | -10.19 |
Drawdowns
SOFR vs. TMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOFR drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, which is greater than TMB's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFR and TMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOFR | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -0.10% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.02% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | — | — |
Volatility
SOFR vs. TMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOFR | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 1.66% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 1.66% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 1.66% | -0.82% |
SOFR vs. TMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOFR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TMB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOFR vs. TMB - Dividend Comparison
SOFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than TMB's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 3.95% | 4.22% | 1.60% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOFR and TMB have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.
SOFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Thornburg. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SOFR and 0.55% for TMB.
Find the right allocation for SOFR and TMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer