SOFR vs. DIVO
SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOFR is a Multisector Bonds fund tracking the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. SOFR is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past year, SOFR returned 3.90% vs 18.37% for DIVO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOFR charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
SOFR vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOFR achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.53% return.
SOFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 18.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
SOFR vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 1.45% | 4.27% | 1.20% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.53% | 17.40% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOFR and DIVO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOFR vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
SOFR
DIVO
SOFR vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOFR | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.66 | 2.06 | +2.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.86 | 3.05 | +3.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.35 | 1.36 | +1.99 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.64 | 3.10 | +6.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.82 | 11.21 | +28.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOFR | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66 | 2.06 | +2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.96 | 0.85 | +4.11 |
Drawdowns
SOFR vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOFR drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFR and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOFR | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -30.04% | +29.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.41% | -5.95% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.82% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -2.61% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 1.64% | -1.54% |
Volatility
SOFR vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) is 0.24%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that SOFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOFR | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.24% | 2.01% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.55% | 6.88% | -6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 8.97% | -8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 11.94% | -11.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 14.84% | -14.00% |
SOFR vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOFR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOFR vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
SOFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than DIVO's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.42% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF | 3.95% | 4.22% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOFR and DIVO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVO has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to SOFR (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOFR dropped -0.41% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 1-year performance, DIVO leads with 18.37% vs 3.90% for SOFR. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 18.37% return vs 3.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 3.95% for SOFR.
SOFR is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DIVO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SOFR and 0.56% for DIVO.
SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOFR and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer