PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOFA vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOFA vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SOFA

1D
2.20%
1M
17.61%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-26.28%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOFA vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOFA and MUU is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOFA vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOFA vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOFA vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFA drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFA and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOFAMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-26.28%

-25.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.78%

-26.28%

-14.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-10.19%

-24.18%

Volatility

SOFA vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOFAMUUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.43%

295.32%

-187.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.43%

295.32%

-187.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.43%

295.32%

-187.89%

SOFA vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOFA vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

SOFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SOFA and MUU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOFA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOFA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

SOFA has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.

SOFA tracks SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SOFA and 1.01% for MUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOFA and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer