SOFA vs. MULL
SOFA (Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SOFA is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOFA charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
SOFA vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SOFA
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- 32.25%
- YTD
- 706.24%
- 6M
- 994.73%
- 1Y
- 3,655.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOFA vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SOFA Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF | -45.16% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 409.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOFA and MULL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOFA vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
SOFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MULL
SOFA vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOFA | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.74 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 69.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 225.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOFA vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOFA drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFA and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOFA | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.90% | -72.29% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.16% | -22.24% | -22.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.00% | -20.67% | -13.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.43% | — |
Volatility
SOFA vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOFA | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 65.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 114.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.03% | 139.58% | -31.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.03% | 139.48% | -31.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.03% | 139.48% | -31.45% |
SOFA vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOFA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOFA vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
SOFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than MULL's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.05% | 0.39% |
SOFA Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOFA and MULL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOFA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOFA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
SOFA has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.05% for MULL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SOFA and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for SOFA and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer