PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOFA vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOFA vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SOFA

1D
-1.38%
1M
12.34%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
-3.04%
1M
32.25%
YTD
706.24%
6M
994.73%
1Y
3,655.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOFA vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOFA and MULL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOFA vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOFA vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOFAMULLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

69.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

225.31

SOFA vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOFA vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFA drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFA and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOFAMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-72.29%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.16%

-22.24%

-22.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.00%

-20.67%

-13.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.43%

Volatility

SOFA vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOFAMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

65.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.03%

139.58%

-31.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

108.03%

139.48%

-31.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.03%

139.48%

-31.45%

SOFA vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOFA vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

SOFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than MULL's 0.05% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SOFA and MULL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOFA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOFA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

SOFA has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.05% for MULL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SOFA and 1.50% for MULL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOFA and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer