PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOFA vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOFA vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SOFA

1D
5.24%
1M
10.37%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDG

1D
-6.80%
1M
102.23%
YTD
357.64%
6M
342.85%
1Y
1,059.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOFA vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOFA and AMDG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOFA vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFA

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOFA vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SOFI Bull 2X ETF (SOFA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOFA vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOFAAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

3.14

-3.89

Drawdowns

SOFA vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFA drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, smaller than the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFA and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOFAAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-63.04%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.84%

-6.80%

-33.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-25.64%

-7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.80%

Volatility

SOFA vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOFAAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

95.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.88%

129.86%

-21.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.88%

130.24%

-22.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.88%

130.24%

-22.36%

SOFA vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOFA vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

SOFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than AMDG's 2.45% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SOFA and AMDG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for SOFA.

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.37% for SOFA.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for SOFA and 0.75% for AMDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOFA and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer