SOEZ vs. SBIT
SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and SBIT (ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Their -0.90 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SOEZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -38.34% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 33.66% return.
SOEZ
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -24.32%
- YTD
- -38.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 33.66%
- 1Y
- 96.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.00M | $31.49M | $45.88M | |
| $83.53K | $76.74K | $179.41K |
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -38.34% | -11.69% |
SBIT ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF | 33.66% | 6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOEZ and SBIT is -0.90, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | -0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOEZ vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SOEZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SBIT
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOEZ | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOEZ | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.14% | -91.35% | +35.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.18% | -78.79% | +30.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -69.10% | +33.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.74% | — |
Volatility
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOEZ | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 65.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.99% | 88.51% | -20.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.99% | 95.96% | -27.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.99% | 95.96% | -27.97% |
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than SBIT's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SBIT ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOEZ and SBIT have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 1.84% for SOEZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 0.97% for SBIT.
Find the right allocation for SOEZ and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer