SOEZ vs. SBIT
SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOEZ is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. SOEZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOEZ achieves a -40.75% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 37.02% return.
SOEZ
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -14.51%
- YTD
- -40.75%
- 6M
- -47.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -40.75% | -11.97% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | 11.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOEZ and SBIT is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | -0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOEZ vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SOEZ
SBIT
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOEZ | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | -0.46 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOEZ drawdown since its inception was -50.21%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOEZ and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOEZ | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.21% | -91.35% | +41.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.21% | -78.26% | +28.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -68.55% | +37.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.69% | — |
Volatility
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOEZ | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 68.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.92% | 87.18% | -18.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.92% | 97.47% | -28.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.92% | 97.47% | -28.55% |
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOEZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOEZ vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SBIT's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOEZ and SBIT have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.57% for SOEZ.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOEZ and 0.95% for SBIT.
Find the right allocation for SOEZ and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer